πŸšͺ

Stage Gate Criteria β€” The Alexander Framework

A reference for when ideas are ready to move between maturity levels. Based on Christopher Alexander's principle: good design is about the relationships between patterns at different scales, not individual elements in isolation.

πŸ’‘ Concepts (Seed β†’ Growing β†’ Mature)

The Promotion Readiness formula on the Concepts DB now tracks this automatically.

Seed β†’ Growing (threshold: 3 connections)

A concept is ready to grow when it has at least three of the following:

  • Connected to 1+ Related Thinkers (someone has thought seriously about this)
  • Connected to 1+ Surprising Links (it resonates structurally with something from a different domain)
  • Connected to 1+ Books (there's a literature behind it)
  • Has a filled Description (you can articulate it in a sentence)

What "Growing" means: You've moved beyond naming the concept. You can explain it, connect it, and see where it shows up elsewhere.

Growing β†’ Mature (threshold: 6 connections)

A concept is ready for maturity when it has at least six total connections across all four categories. This typically means:

  • 2+ Thinkers (multiple perspectives on the same idea)
  • 1+ Surprising Links (cross-domain resonance confirmed)
  • 1+ Books (you've read deeply into it)
  • A rich Description
  • It appears in a Thread in the Threads DB

What "Mature" means: This concept is load-bearing β€” it supports essays, connects thinkers, and generates new seeds. It's part of your intellectual infrastructure.

πŸ’­ Articles in Think DB (Draft β†’ Revisiting β†’ Published)

Draft β†’ Revisiting

  • The article has a clear thesis (not just notes or summaries)
  • It connects to at least 2 concepts in the Concepts DB
  • It has identifiable thinkers who support or challenge the argument
  • There is a seedbed piece that could serve as the essay's opening or emotional hook

Revisiting β†’ Published

  • The argument has a beginning, middle, and end (not just an accumulation of points)
  • It engages at least one counter-argument (not a strawman)
  • It connects to a Thread β€” it's not an island but part of a larger intellectual project
  • Someone other than you would find it interesting (the so what test)
  • You've let it sit for at least one week between the last major edit and marking it Published

🌱 Seeds in The Seedbed (Inbox β†’ Processing β†’ Filed)

Inbox β†’ Processing

  • The seed has a clear Destination (you know which part of your system it belongs to)
  • It contains an actual idea, not just a reference or quote (those go to Collected Wisdom)

Processing β†’ Filed

  • The seed has been incorporated into its destination β€” a concept page, an article draft, a reflection, or Collected Wisdom
  • The Filed To field records where it landed
  • If the seed generated a new concept or new surprising link, those have been created

When to Discard

  • The seed duplicates something already in the system
  • On re-reading, it doesn't spark anything β€” no connection, no energy
  • It was context-dependent and the context has passed

🀼 Thinker Profiles (Seed β†’ Notes β†’ Developed)

Seed β†’ Notes

  • The profile has at least one substantive quote or key idea (not just a bio blurb)
  • The thinker is connected to at least 1 concept via the Concepts DB relation

Notes β†’ Developed

  • The profile includes key works with your notes or reactions
  • The thinker connects to 2+ concepts
  • You can articulate what this thinker means to your thinking β€” not just what they said, but why it matters to your project
  • The thinker appears in a Thread

The Meta-Criterion (Alexander's "Quality Without a Name")

An idea is ready to promote when removing it would leave a visible gap in the system.

If a concept disappeared and nothing else would change β€” no thread would weaken, no article would lose a leg β€” it's not ready. If its absence would be felt, it's ready to move up.

Stage Gate Criteria β€” The Alexander Framework